Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto G84, having a general score of 81.2 against 80.9. LG V40 ThinQ is a way heavier phone than the Moto G84, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much faster processor than Moto G84, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Moto G84 has a little sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G84 features a superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
The Moto G84 counts with a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto G84 also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.