Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 81.2 against 75.8. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is much newer than Moto Z Force, it's a little heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a larger screen and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse video quality and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto Z Force and LG V40 ThinQ count with incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have equal internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a little better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.