Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, with an 81.2 score against 79.8. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. These phones come with Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixels count per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Motorola One Hyper captures much better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.