Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 81.2 score against 80.7. LG V40 ThinQ is a a little lighter and thinner phone than Motorola One Vision, even when both of them were only released 7 months apart. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite better display pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.