Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a general score of 81.2 against 80. The LG V40 ThinQ body is lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released about 11 months before. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater display pixel density.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Zoom has greater battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.