Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is thicker and heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a little larger display. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.