Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11. The LG V40 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it's just a little bit lighter.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processor than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a display that is just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's screen, because although the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
LG V40 ThinQ features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ features a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.