Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is slightly better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has 12 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A13 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.