Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. LG V40 ThinQ's design is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A15 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit more storage for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.