Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, with an 81.2 score against 77. Despite of the fact that the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and much more pixels per display inch.
LG V40 ThinQ takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A20s has greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.