Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A21s's score of 77.7. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give identical OS features. The LG V40 ThinQ body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, even though it was released just a bit over a year before.
LG V40 ThinQ features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a lot better display pixels density. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A21s features a little bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A21s has a superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.