Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a score of 84.6 against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is extremely newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.