Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 81.2 against 79.9. These devices include Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. The LG V40 ThinQ is an noticeably older cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and LG V40 ThinQ have incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot lower pixels count per inch of display and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A25 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.