Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, having an 81.2 score against 77.8. The LG V40 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, but LG managed to build it just a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better screen pixels density. The Galaxy A33 5G counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A33 5G. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features a much better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.