Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with an 81.2 score against 79.4. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is a bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released many years before.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.