Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. The Galaxy A50s construction has the same thickness than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it is a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores. The Galaxy A50s takes much better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy A50s has better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.