Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a 91.3 score against 81.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy A52 5G design is incredibly newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, although it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.