Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a 91.1 score against 81.2. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing some extra features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the LG V40 ThinQ.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52s. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A52s features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A52s features greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.