Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a general score of 85.2 against 81.2. Although it's the best phone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a little bit bigger screen.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 15 percent more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a way more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.