Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy C7, having a score of 81.2 against 77.7. The LG V40 ThinQ construction weights the same than Galaxy C7, but it's just a little thicker. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a greater pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V40 ThinQ shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the Samsung Galaxy C7 have quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.