Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, it's just a bit lighter and newer.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a greater screen density and a quite bigger display. The LG V40 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy C7 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the LG V40 ThinQ one. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.