Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy Fold's construction is newer and a bit thinner than LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's extremely heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold and LG V40 ThinQ count with extremely similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.5 diafragm aperture, a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.