Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS. Samsung Galaxy M51's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than the LG V40 ThinQ. LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M51. They have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 112 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.