Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. LG V40 ThinQ is a just a little lighter phone than the Galaxy Note 5, but both are equally thin. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, counting with some extra features.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. Galaxy Note 5 has a bit more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a little smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a much lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a much larger aperture for better low light images.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.