Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. Galaxy Note10's design is newer and just a little bit lighter, but also a bit thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has more pixels per display inch, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a CPU that is just as good as the LG V40 ThinQ one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Note10 and LG V40 ThinQ count with similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition, a 12 mega-pixels back camera and a same size diafragm aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.