Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note4's general score of 77.6. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer, a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy Note4. LG V40 ThinQ has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a bit larger screen and a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a 0.38 inches camera sensor, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.