Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 89.7 against 81.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and LG V40 ThinQ both feature very similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better storage for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.