Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a 98 score against 81.2. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer than LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with slightly more storage to install games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos, a lot more MP back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.