Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S21 FE has a more recent 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. Galaxy S21 FE's body is incredibly newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE both count with really similar processing units, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 FE counts with better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.