Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a lighter and way thinner cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a little worse screen density, a little bit smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.