Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 81.2 score against 80.1. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is much lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released a little bit over a year before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.5 camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.