Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a extremely thinner but extremely heavier phone than LG V40 ThinQ.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit more vivid display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a way lower amount of pixels in each display inch, it also counts with a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better memory to install games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.