Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Xperia XZs, with an 81.2 score against 77.2. LG V40 ThinQ is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Xperia XZs, although it's also just a little bit heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a higher screen density and a bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Xperia XZs shoots a lot better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and higher 960 fps video frame rate.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.