Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Xperia Z4v, having an 81.2 score against 78.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has a newer 10 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1. LG V40 ThinQ is a newer and somewhat thinner device than the Xperia Z4v, but it is a little heavier.
Xperia Z4v counts with a much better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with 3 GB more RAM. Xperia Z4v captures clearer photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.