Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 76. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. LG V40 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but both are equally thin.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a better display density. LG V40 ThinQ features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4070mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have a 0.38 inches camera sensor, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a way larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.