Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting an 81.2 score against 78.2. The LG V40 ThinQ design is lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 82% bigger battery size.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.