Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has an overall score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 score. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro body is just a little bit thicker and heavier than the LG V40 ThinQ. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The LG V40 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 56% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a much tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.