Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting a general score of 81.2 against 79. Although LG V40 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's construction is lighter and thinner. These phones include Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much more MP camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.