Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's general score of 80.2. The LG V40 ThinQ design is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although both of them were released only a couple months apart. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should count with the same operating system features.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a bit better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.