Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a 93.3 score against 87.6. IPhone 13 Pro's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and LG V60 ThinQ works with Android 11 OS. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a little better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 13 Pro features a faster processor than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
LG V60 ThinQ captures clearer photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images, it also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. LG V60 ThinQ features a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get LG V60 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.