Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, getting an 88.1 score against 87.6. Although the iPhone X is much older than the LG V60 ThinQ, it's construction is somewhat thinner and much lighter. Apple iPhone X counts with a little faster processor than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X features a little sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.