Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Google Pixel, with an 87.6 score against 80.2. The LG V60 ThinQ design is way newer than Google Pixel's, but it's notably heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel counts with a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a way bigger sensor, a bigger aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Google Pixel, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.