Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, having an 87.6 score against 82.5. The LG V60 ThinQ design is newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 2 XL. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better screen density. The LG V60 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot better video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way more MP camera.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.