Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it's a lot heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a much higher video quality.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.