Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's general score of 80.7. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better video definition.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46% greater battery size.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.