Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but it is a little thicker and way heavier. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per screen inch. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a much larger back camera sensor. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.