Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. The LG V60 ThinQ body is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bigger screen. LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35% more battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way bigger sensor, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.