Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, LG V60 ThinQ is a much heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 counts with a processor that's very similar to LG V60 ThinQ's CPU, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels in each display inch. LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Google Pixel 4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.