Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a global score of 87.6 against 87.5. LG V60 ThinQ is a just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much larger sensor and a way more mega pixels back camera.
LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.