Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is slightly better than the LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 global score. The Google Pixel 5 is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than the LG V60 ThinQ, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 5. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera, a much higher video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.